![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7jsMDSFYGCyI4D2-OM11qZmhW0GNIAlguZmF3J4d6BxoXuv7f6DpZ-TAmPGN4S8eDRIWBdtu0CtUHv7nj7acsPl-fkKQAHr3yeowsY64VDev1AlT9JYrFtCP9TRgSgXsfT6pW/s400/Artificial-scribble.jpg)
So here's a question. I did this using
ZeFrank's Scribbler tool. I drew a scribble using my touch pad (represented by the stronger lines) and then I ran the
scribbler tool, stopped the scribbler tool, adjusted colors, transparency,
scribbliness, and ran the tool again. I repeated this process until it looked done to me. The machine generated the image (and it wasn't even my machine, just some anonymous server somewhere out there) but I controlled the machine. Is it art? Is it artificial art?
So my thoughts about art are constantly evolving. When I was younger, representational art seemed more "artsy" to me. But when I realized that no matter how well you render that orange in your still life--while you can eat the model, you can't eat the image. All art has an
ARTificial quality to it. So then I began to think that stylized art had more art to it, than camera precise rendering, which has more technique to it.
No comments:
Post a Comment